One database. Three teams using it differently.

Same claims underneath. Different surface for each team that touches them.

86M biomedical claims / 1.3M/sec ingest / 30+ connectors / Apache 2.0 / Python + Rust
Security & trust

Trust questionnaires that stay current.

Today: answers copied from old questionnaires drift out of policy. Reviewers find it before you do.

With AttestDB: every answer points to a live policy claim. The day one moves, the answers know.

See how →
Agent query
Do you encrypt customer data at rest?
Policy AES-256
security-policy v3 · set 60d ago
Audit SOC 2 confirmed
soc2-2025.pdf · verified Dec 2025
Conflict stale response
Apr 18 questionnaire cited policy v1
Answer
Yes, AES-256. One April response cited an older policy version. Reissue recommended.
Agents

Agents that defend their answers.

Today: "I don't know why it said that" is a sentence you've heard a lot.

With AttestDB: every reply carries its claim chain. Stop debugging vibes, start debugging facts.

See how →
Agent query
Should I auto-approve this $487 expense?
Policy $500 cap
finance-policy.md · current
Vendor 47 prior approvals
no recent flags
Recent similar item retracted
expense #4231 reversed last week
Answer
Approve with note. Within policy, vendor in good standing. One similar item was reversed - flag for finance review.
Records

Customer records that stop disagreeing.

Today: Salesforce says one thing, billing says another, support sees a third. Someone picks silently.

With AttestDB: the disagreement is the answer, both sources visible side by side.

See how →
Agent query
What's our actual ARR for Acme?
Sources $500K / $450K / $475K 3-way conflict
Salesforce (Apr 15) · billing (May 1) · CFO sheet (May 5)
Entity resolved
Acme / Acme Corp / Acme, Inc - same customer
Freshness SF stale 23d
most recent source: CFO sheet, May 5
Answer
$475K (most recent). Three sources disagree by $50K. Salesforce is 23 days behind. Reconcile before Q2 close.